Why Germany lost WWI: Cause of modern Western neoliberalism, danger of China
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | More
After
several
centuries
of
discriminating
and
exploiting
non-white
peoples
across
the
entire
world,
something
very
different
emerged
in
the
West
mainly
due
to
the
pushback
from
the
non-White
peoples
and
the
western
need
for
a
new
means
to
broaden
its
influence
and
dominance
and
leadership
in
the
entire
world;
neoliberalism,
anti-racism,
desegregation,
integration,
and
non-white
immigration
transpired
in
the
West,
both
in
Europe
and
in
North
America.
I’m
beginning
to
think
that
if
Adolf
Hitler
did
not
push
white
racism
to
the
uttermost
extremes
in
his
Nazism,
neoliberalism
probably
would
not
have
happened
in
the
West.
The
British
and
the
Anglo-Americans
who
were
overt
racists
started
to
step
back
from
overt
racism
after
the
defeat
of
the
Nazi
Germany,
not
before,
because
what
they
fought
against
had
to
be
bad
in
some
way,
and
they
couldn’t
be
just
like
whom
they
stood
against.
I
think
Adolf
Hitler
wanted
to
be
like
or
better
than
the
British
and
the
Anglo-Americans
who
had
the
most
power
and
dominance
and
influence
in
the
world
at
the
time,
so
Adolf
Hitler
pushed
white
racism
and
eugenics
to
the
uttermost
extremes,
which
were
the
British
and
Anglo-American
idea
and
practice
and
institution
long
before
Adolf
Hitler;
in
that
sense,
Adolf
Hitler
was
a
copycat
of
the
British
and
the
Anglo-Americans
who
wanted
to
outdo
his
models
and
idols
in
their
own
game,
which
inadvertantly
pushed
the
British
and
the
Anglo-Americans
to
step
back
from
their
traditional
path
of
white
conservatism,
nativism,
and
protectionism.
I
wanted
to
re-exam
the
cause
of
the
rise
of
Adolf
Hitler,
which
was
the
defeat
of
Germany
in
WWI.
Adolf
Hitler
openly
favored
Germany
becoming
the
most
powerful
state
in
the
world
with
the
most
superior
race
of
people;
but
for
the
German
voters
at
the
time,
what
mattered
the
most
was
the
German
economy;
the
racial
superiority
was
an
icing
on
the
cake,
because
it
was
the
German
economy
that
really
mattered
at
the
time,
which
had
detrimental
inflation
and
over
30%
of
unemployment
rate.
So,
why
did
Germany
lose
in
WWI?
It’s
a
well-known
fact
that
the
Germans
blamed
the
German
Jews
for
their
loss
in
WWI.
Before
the
Nazi
rise
to
power,
Jews
represented
less
than
1%
of
Germany’s
population.
If
the
German
Jews,
less
than
1%
of
Germany’s
population
at
the
time,
could
really
cause
Germany
to
lose
in
WWI
because
they
wanted
to,
that
would’ve
been
a
superhuman
achievement;
if
the
German
Jews
were
the
top
1%
of
Germany
at
the
time
economically
and
politically,
it
might
have
been
possible
for
the
German
Jews
to
determine
the
national
fate
of
Germany,
but
certainly
it
was
the
Germans
who
were
in
charge
of
both
economy
and
politics
before,
during,
and
after
WWI.
Germany
during
WWI
had
an
emperor,
a
kaiser;
the
British,
the
French,
and
the
Anglo-Americans
absolutely
hated
the
German
guts,
so
they
defeated
Germany
and
displaced
its
imperial
government
system.
Searching
“why
did
Germany
lose
WWI”
on
the
internet
returns
“Germany
failed
to
succeed
in
World
War
One
because
of
three
main
reasons,
the
failure
of
the
Schlieffen
plan,
nationalism,
and
the
allies’
effective
use
of
attrition
warfare.”,
and
“Germany
lacked
the
necessary
raw
materials
to
make
cordite
(the
vital
propellant
for
bullets
and
shells)
and
explosives.
Austria-Hungary
was
hampered
by
a
lack
of
rail
transport
and
rail
infrastructure.”
At
some
point
in
the
future,
in
my
Unified
Humanity
Science,
I’ll
take
a
deeper
look
into
the
military
logistics
in
WWI.
One
thing
I
strive
to
achieve
in
my
Unified
Humanity
Science
is
QMASPing
(Quantifying,
Modeling,
Analyzing,
Simulating,
and
Predicting)
the
causes
and
consequences
of
the
evolution
of
human
nations
and
societies.
Since
wars,
especially
being
defeated
in
a
war,
cause
a
drastic
and
dramatic
national
reality
change
and
evolution,
I’ll
QMASP
the
causes
and
consequences
of
wars
in
extreme
details
in
my
Unified
Humanity
Science.
Humanity
always
operates
in
cycles;
after
a
period
of
extreme
violence
and
instability,
a
period
of
peace
and
tranquility
and
harmony
follows;
after
a
period
of
peace,
a
period
of
violence
follows;
humanity
has
repeated
that
cycle.
After
the
WWII,
peace
has
been
prevalent
in
the
West;
now,
political
violence
is
on
the
rising
trend
in
the
West,
due
to
non-White
immigration
to
the
West,
global
economic
competition,
and
declining
birthrate
in
the
West
due
to
the
extreme
economic
pressures
created
by
industrialization
and
readily
and
cheaply
available
birth
control
methods.
Realistically,
if
another
nation
overtakes
America
as
the
top
superpower
in
the
world,
it
would
not
be
done
without
some
form
of
a
large-scale
extreme
violence;
a
replacement
of
a
powerful
nation,
especially
a
superpowerful
nation
is
always
done
through
extreme
violence,
through
one
or
more
wars.
Without
WWII,
Britain
would
not
have
lost
its
empire;
Britain
had
to
concede
its
empire
because
of
WWII.
When
Britain
was
weakened
due
to
WWII,
America
and
Britain’s
colonies
such
as
India
seized
the
chance
to
dismantle
the
British
Empire
for
their
gain
and
their
benefit.
I
think
it
behooves
to
look
at
wars
as
international
power
struggles,
international
exertions
of
power,
and
international
replacements
of
power.
If
China
is
really
serious
about
replacing
America
as
the
most
powerful
superpower,
then
China
will
have
to
surpass
America
in
technology,
economy,
and
military,
and
suffer
enormous
human
casualties
for
becoming
the
top
superpower;
I’m
not
sure
if
the
Chinese
people
is
really
willing
to
pay
that
cost
in
replacing
America;
talking
about
becoming
the
most
powerful
nation
in
the
world
is
a
political
entertainment
because
that
appeals
to
the
human
psyche
universally;
but
actually
paying
the
price
for
becoming
and
keeping
being
the
most
powerful
nation
in
the
world
is
a
completely
different
reality;
is
the
Chinese
people
willing
to
pay
the
price
of
several
hundreds
of
millions
of
Chinese
dying
to
secure
becoming
the
most
powerful
nation?
That
can
only
be
revealed
if
and
when
the
moment
of
truth
comes.
But
the
Chinese
history
tells
that
the
Chinese
people
are
willing
to
die
in
massive
numbers
in
wars
for
their
cause;
if
the
Chinese
people
are
really
serious
about
toppling
America,
then
the
bloodshed
across
the
entire
humanity
would
be
enormous,
likely
numbering
in
billions.
The
full-out
nuclear
war
between
China
and
America
might
as
well
be
the
literal
end
of
humanity.
You can invest in my startup company with as little as US$100, for supporting advancing AI, robotics, biotech, and nuclear-fusion powered outer space tech. Visit Robocentric.com/Investors to invest in my startup.
My books on advancing AI, robotics, biotech, and nuclear-fusion powered outer space tech are available at Robocentric.com/Checkout, Amazon, Apple Books, Spotify, Google Play Store, and other online audiobook retailers.
I am Allen Young; I’m an Asian-American man who focuses on advancing AI, robotics, human longevity biotech, and nuclear-fusion powered outer space tech.
